Re: Professing evolution column by Maggie Gallagher

From: Walter Hicks (wallyshoes@mindspring.com)
Date: Thu Feb 06 2003 - 23:45:09 EST

  • Next message: Jim Armstrong: "Re: Professing evolution column by Maggie Gallagher"

    One way, I think, to consider this issue is to chose a subject that is
    not so emotionally charged -- or involving "science vs religion".
    Consider Quantum Mechanics, for example. I have known many scientists
    who think that there is something really wrong with that theory. That
    does not necessarily have any bearing on their understanding of the
    subject. The reasons may even border on the theological as in in
    Einstein's "God does play dice" statement.

    Walt

    "William T. Yates" wrote:

    > Any thoughts?
    >
    > http://www.townhall.com/columnists/maggiegallagher/mg20030206.shtml
    >
    > --Bill Yates
    > --
    > --Bill Yates
    > --mailto:billyates@billyates.com
    > --http://www.billyates.com
    > --CD Reviewer, Webmaster, Roots66.com
    > --Editor, WorldVillage.com's Believer's Weekly
    > --Theron Services: Web Design, Editing, Writing 

    --
===================================
Walt Hicks <wallyshoes@mindspring.com>

    In any consistent theory, there must
exist true but not provable statements.
(Godel's Theorem)

    You can only find the truth with logic
If you have already found the truth
without it. (G.K. Chesterton)
===================================

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Feb 06 2003 - 23:48:53 EST