Re: Evolution & Identity of the ID designer

From: RFaussette@aol.com
Date: Sat Nov 30 2002 - 17:36:58 EST

  • Next message: Walter Hicks: "Re: Evolution & Identity of the ID designer"

    I was addressing Walt because I thought he wrote this:

    In my opinion, the evolutionary THEORY, not the "FACT",=A0 (excuse the=20
    capitals) is just a set of shifting sand that is adamantly supported by=20
    scientists=20
    who refuse to yield any ground at all in their quest for absolute scientific=
    =20
    naturalism=A0 --- proven or not. Slapping Band-Aids year after year on Darwi=
    n's=20
    first=20
    notions hardly makes for an acceptable theory by most scientific standards i=
    n=20
    other fields.=20

    I offered (to the author of that statement):
    what if you were able to find major aspects of evolutionary theory in genesi=
    s=20
    and so give the genesis "tales" scientific plausability, revealed science, i=
    f=20
    you will? If you were able to do that would you accept evolution as fact?

    rich

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Nov 30 2002 - 17:44:29 EST