From: Glenn Morton (glenn.morton@btinternet.com)
Date: Mon Nov 18 2002 - 01:10:39 EST
Dick Wrote:
>Hi Glenn, you wrote:
>
>>Now, if Rohl's view is correct, then what are the implications? Is Dick
>>Fischer then correct to treat the Sumerian religious documents as if they
>>are divinely inspired?
>
>There are some extremely curious parallels that have never been explored
>adequately. Let me clarify and say that I do not regard the Sumerian myths
>as "divinely expired." I believe the Accadians initially were Adamites
>mixed possibly with Ubaidans, and then were Semites after the flood.
The reason I said what I did about you and the Sumerian texts, is that I
have often observed you to believe them when there is a factual dispute with
the Bible. Thus, it is logical to conclude that you beleive them over the
Bible. But, the real question is, do we really worship Ea? What do you
think Dick?
glenn
see http://www.glenn.morton.btinternet.co.uk/dmd.htm
for lots of creation/evolution information
anthropology/geology/paleontology/theology\
personal stories of struggle
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Nov 18 2002 - 01:34:05 EST