Mike wrote:
>-----Original Message-----
>From: MikeSatterlee@cs.com [mailto:MikeSatterlee@cs.com]
>Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 9:13 PM
>You wrote: What you are suggesting is beyond the realm of known
>physical laws
>... It is as bad as anything I have seen in my years of dealing with
>irrational apologetics.
>
>David wrote: A large meteor impact can produce earthquakes. ...
>Earthquakes
>in tectonically active settings can produce abrupt rising or lowering of a
>region (e.g., Chile, with the series of terraces observed by Darwin), ...
>Theoretically, I suppose that it is possible to have a region drop over 20
>feet and come back up about a year later.
>
>Maybe I should let you two debate this issue.
>
Ok, I read David's note yesterday as saying that you don't have a workable
hypothesis, you read it differently. Lets simply ask.
David, do you think Mike has a viable hypothesis geologically? If so, I
would like to know why?
glenn
see http://www.glenn.morton.btinternet.co.uk/dmd.htm
for lots of creation/evolution information
anthropology/geology/paleontology/theology\
personal stories of struggle
>Mike
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 28 2002 - 11:06:58 EDT