(no subject)

From: Vernon Jenkins (vernon.jenkins@virgin.net)
Date: Thu Jun 27 2002 - 11:31:09 EDT

  • Next message: Vernon Jenkins: "Re: Noahic Covenant"

    Hello Mike,

    In response to my suggestion that the ark was designed specifically
    to ensure the
    survival of Noah, his immediate family, and a representative
    selection of animals,
    you wrote:

    That is only your understanding. The text of Genesis, including the verses
    you cite, do not actually say what you imply that they say. In Gen. 6:18 God
    tells Noah that He will establish a covenant with him and that he and his
    family are to enter the ark. God does not say that no one else is allowed to
    also enter the ark. Gen. 6:19,20 does not say that all the remaining space on
    the ark was to be filled by animals. These verses only say that animals were
    to be taken on the ark.

    We read in Heb.11:7, "By faith Noah, being warned of God of things not seen as
    yet, moved with fear, prepared an ark to the saving of his house; by which he
    condemned the ' kosmos' ( = ' world', not ' land' ), and became heir of the
    righteousness which is by faith." God clearly knew that no other
    person on earth
    possessed this righteousness - nor was ever likely to - for "...every
    imagination
    of the thoughts of (their) hearts was only evil continually." (Gen.6:5).

    You then continue:

    Peter called Noah "a preacher of righteousness." (2 Pet. 2:5) What did he
    mean by that? There is only one thing he could have meant. For there has
    always been only one basic message of "righteousness" which God's servants
    have preached. That message is "Repent and be saved." Jonah preached it.
    God's many prophets sent to Israel and Judah preached it. John the baptist
    preached it. Jesus preached it. And Peter himself preached it. Peter strongly
    urged everyone he preached to to "Repent." He told them to do so in order to
    "Save yourself from this corrupt generation." (Acts 2:38-40) According to
    you, Peter was telling us that Noah was an entirely different kind of
    "preacher of righteousness," one quite different from himself and from every
    other "preacher of righteousness" whom God had ever commissioned, one who did
    not urge people to repent and one who offered those he preached to no way to
    save themselves from their corrupt generation. If that is what you are saying
    I can only say that I believe you are badly mistaken. To preach righteousness
    is to urge people to begin living their lives in a righteous manner, with the
    expectation of receiving blessings by God as a result. To be "a preacher of
    righteousness" has always meant just that and it has never meant anything
    else.

    But I wasn't aware that my earlier statement had challenged Noah's
    standing as 'a
    preacher of righteousness' in that sense. The message of the Flood narrative
    appears to be that his words fell on stony ground. However, I'm glad
    you've drawn
    attention to some of the Apostle Peter's words. A fuller excerpt from
    his second
    epistle runs as follows: "And spared not the old ' kosmos' ( = ' world', not '
    land' ) but saved Noah the eighth person, a preacher of
    righteousness, bringing in
    the flood upon the world of the ungodly;..." (2Pet.2:4,5). Observe
    that Peter had
    for 3 years been a close companion of Jesus; his words therefore bear
    the stamp of
    authority. It was the _world_ that was flooded, not the _land_ of Noah.

    I had then said, "What you appear to miss in Gen.6:17 is that the One
    who speaks
    his intention knew Earth to be a sphere and the ' heavens' to extend
    beyond what
    Noah sees above his head.", and you responded:

    Apparently, God was speaking to Noah from Noah's perspective, not from His
    own perspective.

    But why should God pander to Noah's supposedly limited capabilities
    of cognition
    rather than speaking the truth? He had already told Noah what His objective was
    (Gen.6:7) and how He proposed to achieve it (Gen.6:17). A consideration of the
    data provided in Gen.4 and 5 suggests that the Antediluvian
    population in Noah's
    day numbered several billions. From what we know of the colonisation of the
    Americas by settlers travelling by horse and covered wagon these
    would have been
    spread globally by the time of the Flood - there being 1656 years
    available. Noah
    must have been aware that the world he knew was populated in every
    part and would
    surely have well understood what God had in mind.

    Finally, in response to my, "Whether or not Noah understood what the
    Lord really
    had in mind is beside the point. Clearly, (in respect of earth being
    a sphere) we
    today are in a more privileged position than he.", you wrote:

    The only way we can know for sure "what the Lord had in mind" is to see what
    the Lord did. The evidence shows that the Lord did not bring a global flood.
    So the Lord could not have had a global flood in mind.

    Mike, I believe your views are largely conditioned by your desire to
    bolster the
    standing of the Darwinian hypothesis. My approach on the other hand
    is to accept
    the Bible as a body of revealed truth, graciously provided by our Creator, in
    order that ' intellectual cripples' like ourselves may know the
    fundamental truths
    concerning our earthly existence - truths that can come to us by no
    other way. As
    ' lovers of truth', I believe all Christians have a duty to examine
    carefully all
    claims such as you are making (viz, that the Flood was of limited extent - both
    geographically and anthropologically) whose effect is to undermine
    the authority
    of God's Word. In this regard, I have already cited Eph.6:10-17. Here is sound
    advice. But how many believers take the 'spiritual warfare' seriously?

    Sincerely, in His Name,

    Vernon

    MikeSatterlee@cs.com wrote:

    > Hello Vernon,
    >
    > You wrote: the ark was never intended to house more than 8 people (Gen.6:18);
    > all the
    > remaining accomodation was for the animals (Gen.6:19,20)! Have you no better
    > explanation to suggest?
    >
    > That is only your understanding. The text of Genesis, including the verses
    > you cite, do not actually say what you imply that they say. In Gen. 6:18 God
    > tells Noah that He will establish a covenant with him and that he and his
    > family are to enter the ark. God does not say that no one else is allowed to
    > also enter the ark. Gen. 6:19,20 does not say that all the remaining space on
    > the ark was to be filled by animals. These verses only say that animals were
    > to be taken on the ark.
    >
    > Peter called Noah "a preacher of righteousness." (2 Pet. 2:5) What did he
    > mean by that? There is only one thing he could have meant. For there has
    > always been only one basic message of "righteousness" which God's servants
    > have preached. That message is "Repent and be saved." Jonah preached it.
    > God's many prophets sent to Israel and Judah preached it. John the baptist
    > preached it. Jesus preached it. And Peter himself preached it. Peter strongly
    > urged everyone he preached to to "Repent." He told them to do so in order to
    > "Save yourself from this corrupt generation." (Acts 2:38-40) According to
    > you, Peter was telling us that Noah was an entirely different kind of
    > "preacher of righteousness," one quite different from himself and from every
    > other "preacher of righteousness" whom God had ever commissioned, one who did
    > not urge people to repent and one who offered those he preached to no way to
    > save themselves from their corrupt generation. If that is what you are saying
    > I can only say that I believe you are badly mistaken. To preach righteousness
    > is to urge people to begin living their lives in a righteous manner, with the
    > expectation of receiving blessings by God as a result. To be "a preacher of
    > righteousness" has always meant just that and it has never meant anything
    > else.
    >
    > You wrote: What you appear to miss in Gen.6:17 is that the One who speaks his
    > intention knew Earth to be a sphere and the "heavens" to extend beyond what
    > Noah sees above his head.
    >
    > Apparently, God was speaking to Noah from Noah's perspective, not from His
    > own perspective.
    >
    > You wrote: Whether or not Noah understood what the Lord really had in mind is
    > beside the point. Clearly, we today are in a more privileged
    >position than he.
    >
    > The only way we can know for sure "what the Lord had in mind" is to see what
    > the Lord did. The evidence shows that the Lord did not bring a global flood.
    > So the Lord could not have had a global flood in mind.
    >
    > Your brother in Christ,
    >
    > Mike



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 27 2002 - 11:51:26 EDT