List policies

From: Terry M. Gray (grayt@lamar.colostate.edu)
Date: Mon Jun 24 2002 - 23:29:58 EDT

  • Next message: robert rogland: "Response to Burgy-3"

    Here is the first draft, publicly available rules for this list. This
    will be posted on the web and will become part of the material
    initially sent to subscribers.

    Comments are welcome. I'd prefer them to come to me directly rather
    than to the list.

    TG

    _____

    MODERATION, POLICIES, AND ETIQUETTE

    As of the Spring of 2002 this list became a moderated list. Every post to the
    list is approved by the moderator. This allows for more control over spam and
    unruly contributors and promotes general good order. In general, the moderator
    will not filter posts based on their content (except as outlined below), but
    rather based on their character. Since every message must be manually
    inspected,
    there may be a delay between the time a message was posted to the list and the
    time it actually appears on the list.

    1. Posts at all times must be courteous and demonstrate a general charity and
    respect. This does not mean that there cannot be disagreements or
    devastating critiques of different viewpoints. However, it is possible to
    disagree without being disagreeable and to have a devastating critique without
    being harsh, rude or disrespectful. While not everyone agrees as to what
    constitutes harsh, rude, or disrespectful behavior, there does seem to be some
    consensus based on the history of this list. The moderator will not approve
    messages deemed to be of this character. Ordinarily, the message will be sent
    back to the person who posted the message with a request to repost the message
    after eliminating the offensive language.

    2. Quips, one-liners, thank you's, messages that say nothing more
    than "I agree"
    or "I disagree", and other "chat room" type exchanges are
    discouraged. Ordinarily,
    these messages will not be posted and no explanation will be given.

    3. Posts that attempt to undermine the policies and character of the
    ASA will not
    be approved. Decisions not to approve such posts will be made in
    consultation with
    the ASA executive director.

    4. There is no promise that all posts will be of interest to all members. You
    should try to give your post an informative subject line using the suggestion
    outlined above (or something similar) in order to help readers judge whether
    or not a post is interesting. Users not interested in a particular
    subject are encouraged to ignore and delete such messages. This should be
    considered the normal way to handle posts that you are not interested in.

    5. Occasionally, list participants engage in the proverbial "beating
    a dead horse".
    Similarly, some discussions may get to a point where only one or two
    members are
    interested or are participating. Any list member who feels that this
    the case may
    suggest that the discussion of a topic be discontinued. List members may also
    request that those who are interested continue the discussion in private
    correspondence. If insufficient interested in continuing the discussion is
    demonstrated by the list membership, the moderator will suggest that
    discussion of
    the topic be discontinued. If those few members persist in
    discussing the topic
    against the wishes of the group as a whole, the moderator will "not
    approve" messages
    pertaining to that subject. This option should be used sparingly so as not to
    hinder free discussion of ideas of interest to some list members.

    6. People new to the list (or lurkers who have never posted before)
    are encouraged
    to tell the list a bit about their scientific interests and expertise
    and something
    about where they are spiritually (theological or church tradition,
    influences, etc.).
    While we don't want to get bogged down with biographical information, such
    information is usefully background to understanding one another.

    7. Ordinarily, the decision of the moderator not to approve a post
    will be final.
    If you feel that you have been unfairly "not approved", explain your reasons in
    a message directly to the moderator and, if the decision was
    questionable, he or
    she will get an appropriate third party involved to mediate.

    -- 
    _________________
    Terry M. Gray, Ph.D., Computer Support Scientist
    Chemistry Department, Colorado State University
    Fort Collins, Colorado  80523
    grayt@lamar.colostate.edu  http://www.chm.colostate.edu/~grayt/
    phone: 970-491-7003 fax: 970-491-1801
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jun 25 2002 - 23:28:34 EDT