Re: Noahic Covenant

From: MikeSatterlee@cs.com
Date: Fri Jun 21 2002 - 01:57:07 EDT

  • Next message: MikeSatterlee@cs.com: "Re: Noahic Covenant"

    Vernon,

    Your question was to Glen. But since it was also sent out to the whole list
    I'll respond to it.

    You wrote: no doubt you will remember that a significant item in the list is
    the guarantee that "neither shall all flesh be cut off any more by the waters
    of a flood; neither shall there any more be a flood to destroy the earth."
    (Gen.9:11). ... That all seems clear enough - but only if the Flood had been
    _global_ - for manifestly, since Noah's day, there have been many _local_
    floods - some of which have wiped out whole communities. May I ask how you as
    a Christian and local flood theorist make sense of this matter.

    The Hebrew word which is translated as "earth" in Gen. 9:11 is much more
    often translated in the Old Testament as "land," such as in "the land of
    Shinar" and "the land of Canaan." Same word. Look it up.

    So, God was not promising Noah that He would never again allow a flood to
    destroy any land area on Earth. He was telling Noah that He would never again
    allow a flood to destroy the land Noah then called home. The land that was
    then completely destroyed by the Genesis flood was the land of Noah, a land
    which Bible historians refer to as "Mesopotamia," a land which is now located
    in southern Iraq. Since the time of Noah's flood this land has never again
    been completely destroyed by a flood. Though it has since that time
    experienced some small amount of flooding when the Tigress and Euphrates
    Rivers have overflowed their banks, no flood has since that time ever again
    destroyed the area of land which Noah once called home.

    By the way, the flood of Noah's day could not have been either geographically
    or anthropologically global. For scientists assure us that our earth has
    never been completely covered with water at any time since land masses first
    emerged from its once global sea many millions of years ago. And many
    indisputable physical facts prove that our earth could certainly not have
    been completely flooded with water at anytime within the last 50,000 years.
    (Among them is a similar number of annually deposited layers of ice which
    have been counted in Greenland and Antarctica. They show no disturbance by
    any global flood during the time of their being laid down.)

    Bible chronology dates Noah's flood within the last 5,000 years. And the
    historical setting described in Genesis tells us that the flood must have
    occurred within the last 10,000 years. For Genesis tells us that at the time
    of the flood people were herding animals, raising crops, forging metals and
    building cities, things which science assures us did not take place on earth
    any earlier than 10,000 years ago. Science also assures us that North America
    has been continually inhabited for 15,000 years and Australia for 30,000
    years.

    So when did Noah's "global" flood take place?

    The facts of scripture and science combine to clearly show that Noah's flood
    could not have been global, it could not have killed all people on the earth
    who were then outside the ark, and we cannot all be Noah's descendants. Thus
    God's promise to Noah about never again allowing a flood to destroy the land
    must have referred only to the land of Noah. God has kept this promise.

    Mike



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 21 2002 - 09:15:41 EDT