RE: Historical accuracy?

From: Stephen J. Krogh (panterragroup@mindspring.com)
Date: Thu Jun 13 2002 - 12:22:50 EDT

  • Next message: Jim Eisele: "RE: Scholasticism dishonors Christ"

    Good point. Also, it says that it is "God-breathed" and useful for teaching,
    rebuking, correcting and training in "righteousness," IOW, how to be. It
    does not say that it is "God-breathed" and useful for teaching, rebuking,
    correcting and training in Geology, Biology, or Astrophysics, etc. I think
    that point is lost on many.

    Stephen J. Krogh, P.G.
    The PanTerra Group
    http://panterragroup.home.mindspring.com
    ==========================================

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu [mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu]On
    > Behalf Of J Burgeson
    > Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 11:10 AM
    > To: asa@calvin.edu; burgytwo@juno.com
    > Subject: RE: Historical accuracy?
    >
    >
    > >>16. All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking,
    > >>correcting and training in righteousness,
    > 17. so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.
    >
    > Inerrancy is extrapolated from what is actually referenced here.>>
    >
    > Inerrancy can be so extrapolated from that particular verse. But what
    > Scripture doe it referr to? As I understand, it was written long years
    > before the gospels, as well as more years before the Canon was
    > established.
    > The likely reference is, of course, to the Hebrew scriptures only.
    >
    > Burgy
    >
    >
    >
    > _________________________________________________________________
    > Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 12:24:38 EDT