Re: Historical accuracy?

From: Walter Hicks (wallyshoes@mindspring.com)
Date: Mon Jun 10 2002 - 15:38:36 EDT

  • Next message: Jim Eisele: "Re: Historical accuracy?"

    Jim Eisele wrote:

    > I asked
    >
    > >What do you make of the OT prophecies?
    >
    > Walt did not answer this question. Walt is "getting off track."
    > I dare say, Walt is "wasting everybody's time."

    The reason that Walt did not answer your question is because, as usual,
    your avoided 90% of a post and then tossed out a one sentence snip just to
    satisfy your own preconceived notions. When you make comments to Walt.,
    then Walt will answer as he pleases. If you do not like that, save some
    electrons in cyberspace by not addressing me in the first place.

    I have no intention of answering your little snips, so stop wasting my
    time -- and that of others will not be wasted either.

    > In all likelihood, I will simply
    > ignore any future posts that ignore the relevant questions.

    Please do!

    Walt

    ===================================
    Walt Hicks <wallyshoes@mindspring.com>

    In any consistent theory, there must
    exist true but not provable statements.
    (Godel's Theorem)

    You can only find the truth with logic
    If you have already found the truth
    without it. (G.K. Chesterton)
    ===================================



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 10 2002 - 15:37:23 EDT