Re: Oil and gas everywere

From: bivalve (bivalve@mail.davidson.alumlink.com)
Date: Mon Jun 03 2002 - 16:07:49 EDT

  • Next message: Michael Roberts: "Re: Scripture and Divine Sovereignty (was Brainlessness...)"

    This article relies on two doubtful assumptions. First, it assumes
    that technological innovation will continue to make more oil
    accessible, and that increases in demand will make presently
    uneconomical deposits appealing. Technological innovation and
    increasing demand will make more oil deposits accessible, but they
    will also increase the price. At some point, the cost of extracting
    the remaining oil will exceed the benefit. For example, if it takes
    more energy to extract and transport the oil than we can get by
    burning it, then extracting this oil as fuel becomes a net loss. By
    ignoring such upper limits, this extrapolation becomes irresponsible.

    A second assumption is that two reports of reservoirs refilling from
    deeper sources proves that petroleum is predominantly produced
    inorganically deep in the earth and that this in turn implies vast
    reservoirs deep in the earth. Most petroleum has chemical traces of
    organic origin. Perhaps some is produced inorganically, but there
    are also multiple sedimentary layers that can serve as deeper sources
    for refilling.

         Dr. David Campbell
         Old Seashells
         University of Alabama
         Biodiversity & Systematics
         Dept. Biological Sciences
         Box 870345
         Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
         bivalve@mail.davidson.alumlink.com

    That is Uncle Joe, taken in the masonic regalia of a Grand Exalted
    Periwinkle of the Mystic Order of Whelks-P.G. Wodehouse, Romance at
    Droitgate Spa

    ---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
    From: Walter Hicks <wallyshoes@mindspring.com>
    Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 11:02:16 -0400

    >" Of all the things we have to worry about in this day and age, running
    >out of oil should not be one of them."
    >
    >
    >So says an article on national review online.
    >
    >http://www.nationalreview.com/nrof_bartlett/bartlett052902.asp
    >
    >
    >hmmm
    >
    >Glenn?
    >
    >
    >--
    >===================================
    >Walt Hicks <wallyshoes@mindspring.com>
    >
    >In any consistent theory, there must
    >exist true but not provable statements.
    >(Godel's Theorem)
    >
    >You can only find the truth with logic
    >If you have already found the truth
    >without it. (G.K. Chesterton)
    >===================================
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 03 2002 - 23:41:56 EDT