"D. F. Siemens, Jr." wrote:I don't think "Trinity" is a very good basis
for your point. I believe that, while the term is not biblical, the
concept is, and could be recognized only on the basis of revelation. The
traditional rejection, on the basis that 1+1+1 cannot equal 1, is
philosophical in nature. Only recently have some recognized that
aleph-null x3 necessarily equals aleph-null.
Both arguments miss the point since they fail to realize that
the unity of God can be organic rather than mathematical. The doctrine
of the Trinity is not theological algebra.
Shalom,
George
George L. Murphy
http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/
"The Science-Theology Interface"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 08 2001 - 20:12:00 EST