On Wed, 30 May 2001 10:44:57 -0400 (EDT) Joel Cannon
<jcannon@jcannon.washjeff.edu> writes:
> It appears from this that you would agree with Richard Dawkins, Carl
> Sagan, etc. that God is a hypothesis competing with science to
> explain the natural world.
>
> How can a God who sent his Son to give us new life to die for us on
> the cross be irrelevant?
By setting religion up as contingent on a "God of the Gaps", showing how
the gaps have been explained, and saying therefore God is not necessary
to explain the cosmos.
Ask me how I know. :-)
Bill
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 30 2001 - 23:20:22 EDT