Re: Ian Barbour's "When Science Meets Religion"

From: John W Burgeson (burgytwo@juno.com)
Date: Wed May 30 2001 - 16:28:07 EDT

Next message: George Andrews Jr.: "Re: Ian Barbour's "When Science Meets Religion""

Previous message: bivalve: "Icons of evolution"
Maybe in reply to: John W Burgeson: "Ian Barbour's "When Science Meets Religion""
Next in thread: George Andrews Jr.: "Re: Ian Barbour's "When Science Meets Religion""
Reply: George Andrews Jr.: "Re: Ian Barbour's "When Science Meets Religion""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>>
The way I understand it, pantheism says God is Nature; panentheism says
God
is fully in nature and encompasses it; i.e. transcendence is maintained
as
well>

That's the definition OK. But a definition is incomplete unless one knows
how to understand it. It is this understanding that I am having
difficulty with.

Burgy (John Burgeson)

www.burgy.50megs.com

Next message: George Andrews Jr.: "Re: Ian Barbour's "When Science Meets Religion""
Previous message: bivalve: "Icons of evolution"
Maybe in reply to: John W Burgeson: "Ian Barbour's "When Science Meets Religion""
Next in thread: George Andrews Jr.: "Re: Ian Barbour's "When Science Meets Religion""
Reply: George Andrews Jr.: "Re: Ian Barbour's "When Science Meets Religion""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 30 2001 - 16:27:36 EDT