RE: Fossil article (abstract)

From: Hofmann, Jim (jhofmann@exchange.fullerton.edu)
Date: Sat May 26 2001 - 20:58:50 EDT

  • Next message: Vandergraaf, Chuck: "RE: miraculous healing"

     Here's the NY Times report on this article with the perhaps overstated
    headline "Fossil Findings May Force Revisions in the History of Life"

    http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/22/science/22SPEC.html

    Jim Hofmann
    Philosophy Department and Liberal Studies Program
    California State University Fullerton
    http://nsmserver2.fullerton.edu/departments/chemistry/evolution_creation/web

    -----Original Message-----
    From: John W Burgeson
    To: asa@calvin.edu
    Sent: 5/25/2001 9:29 AM
    Subject: Fossil article (abstract)

    Jim Hoffman kindly sent me the abstract of the fossils article that so
    impressed me that I erased it.

    Here it is:

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Vol. 98, Issue 11, 6261-6266, May 22, 2001

    Effects of sampling standardization on estimates of Phanerozoic marine
    diversification

    Contributed by D. M. Raup, March 26, 2001

    Global diversity curves reflect more than just the number of taxa that
    have existed through time: they also mirror variation in the nature of
    the fossil record and the way the record is reported. These sampling
    effects are best quantified by assembling and analyzing large
    numbers of locality-specific biotic inventories. Here, we introduce a
    new
    database of this kind for the Phanerozoic fossil record of marine
    invertebrates. We apply four substantially distinct analytical methods
    that estimate taxonomic diversity by quantifying and correcting for
    variation through time in the number and nature of inventories.
    Variation
    introduced by the use of two dramatically different counting protocols
    also is explored. We present sampling-standardized diversity estimates
    for two long intervals that sum to 300 Myr (Middle
    Ordovician-Carboniferous; Late Jurassic-Paleogene). Our new curves
    differ
    considerably from traditional, synoptic curves. For example, some of
    them
    imply unexpectedly low late Cretaceous and early Tertiary diversity
    levels. However, such factors as the current emphasis in
    the database on North America and Europe still obscure our view of the
    global history of marine biodiversity. These limitations will be
    addressed as the database and methods are refined.

    The article itself had rather more discussion of what the abstract
    mentions as "differ considerably."

    Burgy (John Burgeson)

    www.burgy.50megs.com



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat May 26 2001 - 20:59:25 EDT