==========================================================
Note: The original target post to which this thread refers
may be seen at:
http://people.ne.mediaone.net/ghammond/godinthebox.html
==========================================================
Adam Marczyk wrote:
> > Anyway, to answer your question, the FIRST THING the scientific result
> > says is that the "physical being" that has been discovered, is in
> > fact the one and the same "being" that is described in the Bible.
>
> I think you lost me. How did you determine this? As far as I can follow what
> you're saying, the curvature of psychometric space is a function of the
> secular trend increase in brain size. How did you get from there to God? And
> wouldn't this mean that God didn't exist until humans existed? If so, he can
> hardly be the Creator of the world described in the Bible or the texts of
> most other major world religions.
[Hammond]
Ouch... cripes you are smart... smarter than me probably.
OK, one thing at a time. Your statement:
"As far as I can follow what you're
saying, the curvature of psychometric
space is a function of the secular
trend increase in brain size."
This statement is absolutely correct, and just about
summarizes the entire theory. Thanks, I was beginning
to think I was the only one left in the world who
could still think logically.
Then you say:
"How did you get from there to God?
And wouldn't this mean that God didn't
exist until humans existed?
OK, take the second question first. The answer is YES,
and NO, that "God didn't exist until Humans existed". Let
me explain that, because that explanation shows why both
Creationism, AND Evolution are both scientifically correct.
According to the theory, which shows that "reality" is
a function of brain growth (i.e. with more growth the
person gets closer to absolute reality), we immediately
conclude that the brain itself therefore "creates reality".
Therefore, "reality" as we know it, did not and could not,
exist before the advent of the human brain, some, say,
60,000 years ago (Homo s. sapiens). This then, is the
so called "Biblical" age of the World, or Universe. This
is the (Biblical) Date of Creation.
On the other hand, "reality" contains past, present and
future. The past and the present, and even our expectation
or concept of the future, were "created" (came into existence)
60,000 years ago when we were "created". In other words,
a 15-billion year history was "created" 60,000 years ago
when Man was Created. This is easily proved by the fact
that this 15-billion year history would cease to exist if
all men died tomorrow. If all men died tomorrow, by definition,
the Universe as we know it, would cease to exist, since the
"universe as we know it" is only defined by the human brain.
So, we are talking about two different realities. "Absolute
reality" only exists as long as Man is alive to maintain it.
"Relative reality" is the body of "Laws of Physics" which
hold true according to Mans perception. The Laws of Physics
cannot "define reality", they can only discover the Laws relating
one human sensation to another. For instance, Physics cannot
define Mass, Length and Time. It can only discover the Laws
relating Mass, Length and Time. Mass, length and time are
only "defined" by holding up a brass cylinder, Platinum
rod and Cesium clock and asking for a majority vote on
whether everybody "thinks" that these are specimens of what
everybody is calling "Mass, length and time".
OK, so within the laws of relative reality, Evolution is
absolutely scientifically true, and Life began 3-billion
years ago. On the other hand, scientifically, the entire
Universe was literally "Created" by God, 60,000 (or even
6,000) years ago. CREATIONISM AND EVOLUTION ARE BOTH
ABSOLUTELY SCIENTIFICALLY CORRECT.
Problem is, at the present time science does not know
this, and falsely claims that only Evolution is a "scientific"
fact, and that "Creationism/Bible" is NOT a scientific
fact. SCIENCE IS WRONG.
My discovery of a scientific proof of God proves that
the Bible is scientifically correct, and in fact, is not
at odds with Evolution.
OK, now getting back to your first question:
"How did you get from there to God?"
meaning, how do I show that:
the curvature of psychometric
space as a function of the secular
trend increase in brain size = GOD
OK, here's where you have to put on your scientific hat.
Basically the answer is; "it's obvious"... of course it's
only obvious to a professional.
The identification is made in the standard, by the
book scientific methodology that is used to make all
scientific identifications.
For instance, P.A.M. Dirac is famous (Nobel Prize) for
discovering a Quantum Mechanics equation (Dirac Equation)
which predicted that there existed negative energy
particles. No one could believe this. Then, about 7 years
later, Anderson discovered the Positron. It had the same
mass as an Electron but a positive charge. People began
to suspect that this was Dirac's "negative energy" particle.
It was just an Electron with an opposite charge.
Now, there is no way you can "absolutely prove" this. All
you can do is examine all the evidence, and submit it to
massive scientific scrutiny and opinion, and, sure enough,
it wasn't long before all concurred that it sure enough
was Dirac's negative energy particle.
Same is true for the scientific proof of God. You see,
THERE IS NO existing scientific definition of God. All we
know about "God" is a 4,000 year old religious tradition
which is apparently subscribed to more or less by about
5 billion people. And the description of this God is kind of
sketchy, however, quite extensive, in the 1,024 pages of the
Bible. So, all science can do is be on the lookout for
any newly discovered scientific phenomena which might turn out
to be an actual detection of such a thing.
Or consider Atlantis. There is a 2500 year old rumor about
a lost continent sunk in the Atlantic. Now suppose some submarine
expedition discovered a vast ancient city on the sea floor in
the middle of the Atlantic, including 5 story buildings, paved
roads and tens of thousands of dwellings, stretching for
hundreds of miles, and in the middle of town a stone Stella
saying "Remember us we who are about to die, our country is
sinking into the Sea, most have left, we are all lost forever".
Now, I suppose you can argue that you couldn't "prove" that
it was Atlantis.... but I don't think very many reasonable people
would seriously doubt it.
OK, that's what's happened, Hammond discovered that Psychometry
suddenly has found a surprising solution to the Structural
Model question, and in the process has stumbled on something
that looks like it might be a scientific detection of this
mysterious entity know as "God" for 4,000 years.
At that point, it becomes a routine by the book problem
to decide if it is. Basically you have to meet all of the
following criteria for a "scientific proof":
5. If such a physical phenomena were discovered which
seemed to explain "God", the truth of the discovery
could only be judged on the basis of it meeting the
following commonly known scientific criteria:
A. COMPREHENSIVENESS.. it would have to explain
every last detail of what has been observed
historically about "God", including:
1. Polytheism vs. Monotheism
2. The Crucifixion
3. Miracles and revelation
4. Heaven
5. Eternal Life
6. All the "signs and wonders"
of every known religion
7. The Creation
8. Kingdom Come
9. Prayer
10. And everything else ever written
about "God"
B. MEASURABLE... besides being comprehensive
the phenomena must produce a physically
measurable result, an actual physical measurement
of "God".
C. EXPERIMENTALLY CONFIRMED.. the physical
result must be confirmed overwhelmingly by
experimental data which is replicable, stable
and independently confirmed, preferably over many
years and by many people.
D. AXIOMATIC THEORETICAL EXPLANATION..
besides the experimental result, the result must
have a theoretical explanation derived directly
from the axiomatic laws of physics. The most
convincing theory would obviously be one in which
"God" turned out to be explained by THE most
fundamental axiomatic law of physics.
(cited from:
http://people.ne.mediaone.net/ghammond/Theoryexpo.html
OK, to make a long story short, my theory and the evidence
that it produces, meets every one of the above scientific
criteria hands down and with flying colors. No problem.
Therefore, the identification of the discovered scientific
phenomena with "God" is overwhelming and proven beyond
any possible doubt. As firmly as Dirac's Positron in fact.
-- BE SURE TO VISIT MY WEBSITE, BELOW: ----------------------------------------------------------- George Hammond, M.S. Physics Email: ghammond@mediaone.net Website: http://people.ne.mediaone.net/ghammond/index.html -----------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 25 2001 - 04:40:42 EDT