[Fwd: [Fwd: [Fwd: Griffin #2]]]

From: Lucy Masters (masters@cox-internet.com)
Date: Fri May 25 2001 - 00:26:21 EDT

  • Next message: Vandergraaf, Chuck: "RE: [Fwd: [Fwd: [Fwd: Griffin #2]]]"

    Lucy replies:

    I can only speak for myself. The teaching of evolution (me teaching it
    or me studying it under someone else) has never hurt my faith.

    My son thinks Steven Spielberg is the most amazing man. He watches his
    movies over and over and over. One night on an educational station we
    watched a 2-hour special on "how Spielberg does what he does." (Don't
    remember the name of it). It showed the evolution of his movies, why
    they cost so much, how the creatures were made, the techniques for
    animating the creatures, and so on.

    Understanding **how** Spielberg weaves his magic did not lessen my son's
    admiration for him; HIS ADMIRATION INCREASED. By the end of that
    special, my son was even more amazed by the details of what Spielberg
    has done.

    That's how I feel about evolution. The more I know, the more amazed I
    am by how God works. The whole process is positively stunning. The
    fact that we don't have the story completely pieced together is no
    bother to me; it gives us something to research!

    Blessings, Lucy


    attached mail follows:


    In a message dated 5/24/01 9:35:34 PM Mountain Daylight Time,
    bpayne15@juno.com writes:

    > I am strongly in favor of the ID movement; evolution is being used by
    > many to undercut our faith by making God irrelavant - especially in our
    > schools (IMHO).
    >

    I hope these two clauses are not as directly linked as they appear to be.
    All sorts of things can get "used by many to undercut our faith."
    Heliocentrism and Newtonian physics being two historic examples. If
    evolution is being used in that manner (which I would agree that it is,
    though probably not to the extent Bill Payne would say it is), should not our
    primary call be to oppose this *misuse* of the science? The only motivation
    for opposing the science itself should be if the science is not true, which
    is not the motivation Bill states.

    If we recognize God's sovereignty over nature, then natural explanations like
    evolution (whether true or not) can never "undercut our faith."

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    Dr. Allan H. Harvey, Boulder, Colorado | SteamDoc@aol.com
    "Any opinions expressed here are mine, and should not be
     attributed to my employer, my wife, or my cats"



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 25 2001 - 00:25:18 EDT