Vince D. Calhoun wrote:
>
> >Your remarks are only suitably addressed to some researcher
> >doing a single experiment.
>
> Not true...since you will not provide the details of your analyses I have
> nothing else to add.
[Hammond]
What "analysis", the facts are prima facie patently obvious.
did Balboa need to do an "analysis" when he discovered
the Pacific Ocean? What are you talking about?
If you can't see what the "details" amount to
after reading my website, you're incompetent.
>
> > A copy of my published paper explaining all this is located
> >at:
> >http://people.ne.mediaone.net/ghammond/cart.html
> >I don't expect anybody to get their feet down off the desk
> >and actually read this paper, of course. What i realize is
>
> I read this paper (and most of the stuff on your web site) prior to
> responding....as I said earlier, some relevant details are lacking, and you
> have not established causation (or even attempted to).
[Hammond]
Saying that I "have not established causation" is a
scientifically incompetent remark, probably because you
are not qualified to read the Neuropsychology or have
no training in theoretical Physics. Since "causation"
is so obvious as to be readily apparent to a wide awake
high school student never mind a competent scientist,
I suspect that you have neither the academic nor professional
qualifications to back up your wonted opinions.
Do you mind if I inquire as to exactly what your academic
or professional qualifications might be? Or is that
"none of my business"?
Since you seem to love little maxims and quotations
here's an original from me:
Ignorance in itself is no problem, but trying to bluff
people about it is.
-- BE SURE TO VISIT MY WEBSITE, BELOW: ----------------------------------------------------------- George Hammond, M.S. Physics Email: ghammond@mediaone.net Website: http://people.ne.mediaone.net/ghammond/index.html -----------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 21 2001 - 01:20:48 EDT