Hammond backs Ken Ham

From: George Hammond (ghammond@mediaone.net)
Date: Sat May 19 2001 - 06:25:31 EDT

  • Next message: George Hammond: "GOD IN THE BOX... (what is a Factor Analytic proof of God?)"

    [Hammond]
    I have carefully read Ken Ham's letter about the Kansas
    Board of Education situation:

    http://www.creationists.org/kenhamkansas.html

      My first impression is that the guy is certifiably ok,
    attitude wise. He is concerned with the rise
    of "Humanism" at the expense of the traditional Christian
    viewpoint. I agree with him. There has been something
    sinister about "Survival of the Fittest" since the beginning,
    and it's getting out of hand in recent years, what with the
    abuses of scientific discoveries like IQ testing, Genetic
    theories of Human superiority, Mysticism coming out of QM, "Final
    theories of everything", "Fuzzy Logic", "Chaos Theory" and, in
    my view a heretical twisting of the object of scientific
    research toward the promotion of the moral justification
    of licentious attitudes, social division, and even the
    destruction of science itself as well as reliable religious faith.
      He points out that there is more to the Creationist standpoint
    than the Age of the Earth, it's about the fact that many people
    who are not scientists know the historical (even political
    and scientific) importance of God, while those ignorant of it
    seem to be bombarding us with anti-Christian interpretations
    of scientific facts like Survival of the Fittest, the meaning of IQ,
    the meaning of Quantum Mechanical Laws etc. etc.
      Ken Ham knows there is a God, but it's a tough road arguing
    it against pure science which does not formally recognize God
    and cannot explain God. Nonetheless, as science seems to move
    more and more toward a "life is a random event", and "there is only
    random brutality and chance" at the basis of Life, people who know
    better from thousands of years of religious history, are
    definitely becoming concerned about this secular drift and its impact
    on public education and the moral rearing of children. I certainly am.
       I am a physicist myself, and haven't been inside a church in twenty
    years. My widowed mother dragged me to a Latter Day Saints Church for
    years when I was a kid mainly because the Minister was a family friend.
    Generally I claim the Congregational Church as my place of worship since
    becoming an adult.
      As you know, as a physicist, I have advanced the claim that I have
    discovered a hard scientific explanation and proof of God (see my
    website, URL below). I claim that this scientific proof, based on
    100 years of data from Psychometry, Biology and General Relativity.
    As you know I claim that this scientific discovery easily meets all
    of the standards of modern scientific proof, and would in fact be
    trivially obvious to any first rank scientists with the
    perequsite interdisciplinary credentials to review it. I have in
    fact suggested Professor Robert Elliot Pollack director of the CSSR
    at Columbia as one such scientist that I am aware of who is actually
    qualified.
      To get to the point, it is my belief that someone like Ken Ham should be
    advised of this new discovery, and should at least be aware that the
    Fundamentalist, Christian, and even Creationist viewpoint now has an
    absolutely hard science, Physics, proof of the truth and validity of
    it's factual standpoint. I will, and have, even gone so far as to state
    that the discovery flat out proves that Creationism is a hard scientific
    theory equally as valid as Evolution and has a right to be tought in
    public schools alongside Evolution as a scientifically explainable and
    proven phenomenon. So should the scientific explanation and proof of God be
    tought in public schools as a scientific subject. And I'm sure it will be
    sooner than people think.
      I certainly would like to talk to Ken Ham about this new development,
    about getting it confirmed by other competent scientists, and about
    getting it secured in the arsenal of defense of Christianity in the
    ongoing debate between Science and Religion. The scientific proof of God
    has arrived, and I'm here to notify the Fundamentalists, and other
    religious groups about it.
      As a curious side note, my father legally changed his name from Ham
    to Hammond the year before I was born.

    Shalom, and God Bless, George Hammond

    -- 
    BE SURE TO VISIT MY WEBSITE, BELOW:
    -----------------------------------------------------------
    George Hammond, M.S. Physics
    Email:    ghammond@mediaone.net
    Website:  http://people.ne.mediaone.net/ghammond/index.html
    -----------------------------------------------------------
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat May 19 2001 - 06:17:16 EDT