Re: SOC/PSYC: Scientific Proof of God

From: george murphy (gmurphy@raex.com)
Date: Fri May 11 2001 - 07:13:08 EDT

  • Next message: Howard J. Van Till: "Re: SOC/PSYC: Scientific Proof of God"

    George Hammond wrote:

    > [Hammond]
    > Dear Dr. George Murphy (Physics):
    >
    > Excuse me for responding to you personal email publicly,
    > however, I must inform you that I do not talk to people
    > privately unless they are recognized international authorities,
    > Nobel Laureates, or unusual interdisciplinary experts.

            This shows an utter disregard for civilized standards of discourse.
    As for the rest of your post, it is clear that you simply do not know what you
    are talking about. This correspondence is closed.

    George Murphy

            PS to others on the ASA list: This is almost a textbook example of
    the MO of cranks: The initial approach in which the world-shaking discovery
    is announced is couched in relatively polite language. As soon as any
    criticism is made, however, there is a snarling response announcing that only
    the crank knows the truth and that the critic just isn't able to appreciate
    his greatness.

    GLM



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 11 2001 - 07:14:31 EDT