Re: Distal vs. proximate:

From: Keith B Miller (kbmill@ksu.edu)
Date: Thu May 10 2001 - 21:36:54 EDT

  • Next message: Steve Krogh: "Re: SOC/PSYC: Scientific Proof of God"

    Bob wrote:

    >Why do you fail to see that I am advocating a differential analysis approach
    >that seeks to identify, and if possible, quantify the different contribution
    >of various causal variables, in this case, natural selection and intelligent
    >design, to the phenomenon being studied. This is not either/or.

    Let me try to explain Howard's point.

    Lets us say we were looking for the causal factors in the rate of a
    particular chemical reaction. Someone decided to "quantify the different
    contribution
    of various causal variables, in this case, temperature and concentration of
    a particular reagent." As stated these are being consider as two different
    variables.

    That is what you apper to be saying - "natural selection" and "intelligent
    design" are being considered as two different variables. The issue for
    Howard and me is that these _are not_ separate variables to us. We
    understand natural selection as an expression of intelligent design by the
    Creator. They are not two separate causal variable like temperature and
    concentration.

    Keith

    Keith B. Miller
    Department of Geology
    Kansas State University
    Manhattan, KS 66506
    kbmill@ksu.edu
    http://www-personal.ksu.edu/~kbmill/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 10 2001 - 21:35:15 EDT