Howard observed:
"Two noteworthy features of the message you copied:
> It may be that the "non-locality" explanation is a
> conceptual "dead-end" and that the alternative explanation will be a
more
> rewarding intellectual enterprise for your students -- especially if
they
> take the Genesis account seriously!
I suspect that this "seriously" means "in the way that _I_take it"
> I am writing anonymously ...
Anonymous messages deserve to be trashed immediately."
If I had been sure of the first point I'd have followed the second one
rather quickly. But I am way over my head on this particular subject and
I don't want to ignore a potentially valid point.
I appreciate the comment. I don't think this author's point is quite as
far out as, say, Veliokowsky or ICR, but maybe... .
I remember doing the MM experiment in college, almost SURE that I'd be
the one to find a light speed difference! < G >
Burgy (John Burgeson)
www.burgy.50megs.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 01 2001 - 10:18:47 EDT