Allen Roy wrote:
<< It really does not matter if they said "some genes" which had been call
junk genes actually have had a function or if they said "all junk genes". I
did not claim that this proves that all junk genes have been shown to have a
function. What this shows is that at this point junk genes may seem to have
no purpose, but Creationists expect, as research continues, more and more
"junk genes" will turn out to have purpose after all.
>>
I don't really see what the point of this is. I accept the
evolutionary theory as a reasonable working hypothesis.
Likewise, I would also expect that many "junk genes" serve
some kind of function that we don't currently understand.
At most, what this indicates is the arrogance of *some* scientist
who think they know everything, not that some junk genes are found
to serve a useful function. It seems that *some* YEC also think
they know everything, so it is not a sin unique to the scientific
establishment alone. True wisdom make one humble.
by Grace alone do we proceed,
Wayne
Whatever process God used to get us here, it is still remarkable
creation and always seems to be coming up with new surprises.
ever since I started considering these matters,
but
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 29 2001 - 09:34:34 EST