1/23/01
I did a bit more research on Paul's claim below and found that 6 months ago
I answered that point IN AN EMAIL TO HIM which he has now brought up again.
On Mon 1/22/01 5:13 AM Paul wrote:
>PS: Again, you can't be serious or you would dump your own theory. Your
>landing spot for the ark is at least 1000 feet higher than the
>Mediterranean
>sea. What did Noah do, push it up the mountain?
Paul, take a look at the asa archives. On June 10, 2000, I wrote a note to
you which said:
"...I now do hold that the ark landed on the shores of Turkey. The Mountains
> of Ararat which is the mountainous region in Eastern Turkey, geologically
> extend from eastern Turkey to Adana. Geologically that entire system is
one
> mountainous region. Thus by landing there near the region of Adana one is
on
> the same mountain chain. It was Bill Hamilton who got me to change on
this
> point. I always try to eliminate my inconsistencies the best that I can.
see
http://www.calvin.edu/archive/asa/200006/0093.html
Paul, this is what I meant when I suggested you do some research into my
views before attacking them. One doesn't mind valid criticisms, but
criticisms based upon poorly done research waste everyone's time.
glenn
see http://www.glenn.morton.btinternet.co.uk/dmd.htm
for lots of creation/evolution information
anthropology/geology/paleontology/theology\
personal stories of struggle
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 23 2001 - 01:43:19 EST