Are Europeans Cows? Implications for Neanderthal relations

From: Glenn Morton (glenn.morton@btinternet.com)
Date: Sat Jan 20 2001 - 06:57:32 EST

  • Next message: Glenn Morton: "RE: Creation Ex Nihilio and other journals"

    I have just finished reading Java Man by Swisher, Curtiss and Lewin. In
    there they referenced an article by Ruvolo which was a statistical analysis
    of genetic studies which purport to show that the out-of-Africa hypothesis
    is correct. I was amazed to find the following in this article, in which the
    standard 'European' mtDNA sequence is partly cow. Being of European descent
    this explains why every now and then I get the urge to eat grass!

            “One aspect of these data should be viewed as tentative. As Horai et al
    (1995) observe, their estimate of 70,000 years for the inferred divergence
    date between European and Japanese mtDNA is older than that calculated from
    gene frequency data (55,000). Because of suspected inaccuracies with the
    standard human reference sequence, Horai et al (1995) used an edited version
    of it, changing bases at seven sites, based on data from other humans and
    hominoids. However, the original representative ‘European’ mtDNA sequence
    comes from more than one individual; most is presumably of European origin
    but some of the sequence (unspecified amounts at unspecified positions) was
    derived from HeLa cells. Since this cell line was established from Henrietta
    Lacks, an African-American woman, some of the ‘European’ reference sequence
    (even the slightly edited version) is likely to be closer to the African
    sequence in certain mitochondrial regions. If on average Africans are
    mitochondrially more distant from other populations, this could potentially
    make the measured ‘European’ Japanese genetic difference greater and and
    give an artificially older date for their divergence. This is indeed what
    the data show: the ‘European’-African difference is slightly less than the
    Japanese-African difference: 93 versus 106 bp different, respectively. Also,
    the ‘European’ reference sequence is not exclusively human: five bp at known
    sites could not be determined unambiguously and were therefore taken to
    match that of the cow. Use of this mosaic ‘European human’ reference
    sequence potentially affects inferences about divergences between Europeans
    and other human populations. Its use should have only a negligible effect on
    the inferred divergence date for modern humans, given what is known about
    the degree of genetic difference of true European mitochondrial sequences
    from those of other populations. Nevertheless. It highlights the need to
    sequence at least one complete mitochondrial genome from a single European,
    to use in place of the standard reference sequence. This same ‘European’
    reference sequence has been used in several other mtDNA studies (Cann et
    al., 1987; Vigilante et al., 1989, 1991; Kocher and Wilson 1991; Ruvolo et
    al 1993)” MaryEllen Ruvolo, “A New Approach to Studying Modern Human
    Origins: Hypothesis Testing with Coalescence Time Distributions,” Molecular
    Phylogenetics and Evolution 5(1996):1, p. 202-219, p. 209

    One might think that replacement theory researchers would cease using this
    sequence given the mosaic nature of it. But such is not the case. Consider
    the comparison of mtDNA from a Neanderthal in which the Anderson sequence
    was used as the primary European comparative mtDNA! Consider this from
    Ovchinnikov et al "Molecular analysis of Neanderthal DNA from the northern
    Caucasus" Nature 404, 490 - 493 (2000)

    "Comparison of the 345-bp fragment of HVRI with the Anderson reference
    sequence 11 and the Neanderthal from Feldhofer Cave 4 revealed 22
    differences (17 transitions, 4 transversions and 1 insertion) and 12
    differences (11 transitions and 1 transversion), respectively. The Feldhofer
    Neanderthal HVRI contained 27 differences to Anderson reference sequence 11
    (over the equivalent 345 bp"

    The reference to the Feldhofer Cave specimen is to the original mtDNA study
    of Neanderthals. Because of the inclusion of bovine mtDNA base pairs into
    the standard "European" sequence it certainly calls to question the
    conclusion that Neanderthal mtDNA is too far from modern human mtDNA for
    them to be -- human.

    glenn

    see http://www.glenn.morton.btinternet.co.uk/dmd.htm
    for lots of creation/evolution information
    anthropology/geology/paleontology/theology\
    personal stories of struggle



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 20 2001 - 06:53:54 EST