Fw: "Thinking God's thoughts after Him"

From: M.B.Roberts (topper@robertschirk.u-net.com)
Date: Tue Jan 16 2001 - 18:04:32 EST

  • Next message: Vernon Jenkins: "Re: Creation Ex Nihilo"

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "M.B.Roberts" <topper@robertschirk.u-net.com>
    To: "george murphy" <gmurphy@raex.com>
    Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 10:07 PM
    Subject: Re: "Thinking God's thoughts after Him"

    > The lapdog of dependent natural theology is fine. Ich bin kein Barthian,
    >
    > Michael
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: "george murphy" <gmurphy@raex.com>
    > To: "Loren Haarsma" <lhaarsma@calvin.edu>
    > Cc: "_American Sci Affil" <asa@calvin.edu>; "Gordon Simons"
    > <gsimons@email.unc.edu>
    > Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 7:43 PM
    > Subject: Re: "Thinking God's thoughts after Him"
    >
    >
    > > Loren Haarsma wrote:
    > >
    > > > > Does anyone know the source of the phrase "Thinking God's thoughts
    > after
    > > > > Him?"
    > > >
    > > > It's commonly attributed to Kepler, but I don't know of any specific
    > > > reference.
    > > >
    > > > > A recent example of "thinking God's thoughts after Him" is described
    > in
    > > > > today's Science section of the NY Times: "Experiments on Dense
    Matter
    > > > > Evoke Big Bang"
    http://www.nytimes.com/2001/01/16/science/16QUAR.html.
    > > > > It seems that scientists working at Brookhaven National Laboratory
    > have
    > > > > now reproduced the same conditions that "existed a few millionths of
    a
    > > > > second after the start of the Big Bang."
    > > > >
    > > > > I wonder whether there is a connection between this latest
    scientific
    > > > > achievement and the events that took place so long ago in the
    Garden.
    > > >
    > > > I've always been taught that we would disobey God if we _failed_ to
    > > > investigate His amazing creation scientifically.
    > > >
    > > > Numerous Christian theologians, philosophers, and educators have
    > > > written at length about this idea. In the interest of time and
    > > > brevity, I'll just mention some Bible texts to consider.
    > > >
    > > > Genesis 1:28 God blessed them and said to them, "Be fruitful and
    > > > increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the fish
    of
    > > > the sea and the birds of the air and over every living creature that
    > > > moves on the ground."
    > > >
    > > > Proverbs 19:2 It is not good to have zeal without knowledge, nor to
    be
    > > > hasty and miss the way.
    > > >
    > > > Matthew 25:14-30 (The parable of the talents).
    > >
    > > The enterprise of "thinking God's thoughts after him" becomes a
    > > problem when it is assumed that one can do this from nature without
    > starting
    > > from God's revelation in Christ. Cf. Paul Davies'
    > > _The Mind of God_. That is why I continue to be such a Barthian killjoy
    > about
    > > all the happy remarks of ASAers about "evidence for God" from science,
    > > "general revelation", "God's two books" &c. Once the camel of
    independent
    > > natural theology gets its nose in the tent, you're in trouble.
    > >
    > > Shalom,
    > >
    > > George
    > >
    > > George L. Murphy
    > > "Theologia naturalis delenda est!"
    > > http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 16 2001 - 18:08:59 EST