Burgy, you wrote:
> Steve -- you wrote:
>
> "> You are disagreeing with what?
> >
> > (1) It would not be in the best interest for YECs to propose a
> > "deceptive God."
> >
> > or
> >
> > (2) a "deceptive God" is a result when the implications drawn from
> > the "appearance of age" argument are taken to a
> > logical conclusion."
> >
> The second of these; I can see I wrote with less than sterling precision.
> Apologies.
>
I seem to have that problem with that too. I thought you were inferring from
my statementl, "although that is a result when the implications drawn from
the "appearance of age" argument is taken to a logical conclusion."
> It is your claim that "a deceptive god" is the necessary result
> of taking a YEC position.
See, I didn't necessarily say "necessary" just a result when the argument is
taken to "A" logical conclusion. Sorry for all the confusion.
Steve
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:49:44 EST