From: <Dawsonzhu@aol.com>
> Is there any possibility that Jesus was simply referring to a passage
> that everyone with familiar with to illustrate his point: i.e., there
> is nothing new under the sun, and people have not listened before and
> will not listen now? It also wouldn't deny the possibility of a flood
> happening much earlier as Glenn Morton or Dick Fischer
> have tried to show. In fact, if it happenned as long ago as Glenn
> proposes, it even emphasizes all the more how little we have
> listened to God throughout the vast ages of time. That is about
> as true a fact as you'll ever come across.
What would be the incentive to do so? Just so that interpretations within
the religious philosophy of Naturalism may be accommodated? Why not
consider interpretations within the religious philosophy or Creationary
Catastrophism?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 10 2001 - 02:05:31 EST