Re: Southern Baptist controversy

From: Brent Foster (bdfoster@shrinkweb.com)
Date: Tue Jan 02 2001 - 18:18:02 EST

  • Next message: Steve Krogh: "Re: Southern Baptist controversy"

    Thanks Kamilla ,

    I hadn't heard about the Kentucky situation. That's interesting as I have relatives in KY. There seems to be a growing number of churches and state baptist associations that are dissenting from the SBC's increasingly conservative positions.

    I was mistaken about the SBC website. I just visited the site and they do have the full text of their June 14 revised Faith and Message statement.
    http://sbc.net/default.asp?url=bfam_2000.html
    It's been a while since I last visited the site. Perhaps the site was updated or perhaps I just overlooked it.

    Brent

    --- "Kamilla ludwig" <kamillal@worldnet.att.net>

    > wrote:

    >Brent,

    >

    >You might have more success getting information from the Cooperative Baptist

    >Fellowship. In my experience, the SBC official channels won't be very

    >forthcoming.

    >

    >The Texas controversy is really an old controversy (and the SBC organization

    >in Kentucky is in a similar situation). This move would just make official

    >what is already happening in reality. They are already sending far less

    >money than they used to. And it's not just churches that are leaving.

    >Faculty are leaving because they are being forced to sign a revised

    >statement of faith, even tenured faculty! There is at least one tenured

    >professor from the SBC seminary in Texas wo took early retirement rather

    >than sign the revised statement which violated his own beliefs.

    >

    >Kamilla

    _____________________________________________________________



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 02 2001 - 18:18:06 EST