----- Original Message -----
From: "George Murphy" <gmurphy@raex.com>
To: "glenn morton" <mortongr@flash.net>
Cc: <PHSEELY@aol.com>; <adam@crowl.webcentral.com.au>; <asa@calvin.edu>
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2000 11:23 AM
Subject: Re: Methane in the late Archean
> The Bhagavad Gita isn't a witness to Jesus Christ (which doesn't mean it's
> of no value at all). The Old & New Testaments are (which doesn't require
that they
> all be accurate science by A.D. 2000 standards). Glenn may reply, "How do
we know that
> what it says about Jesus is correct if we can't trust its statements about
the Flood
> &c?" - & then anyone who is interested can replay the tapes of our
previous debates
Don't you see that what you have is a great tautology. The Bible is the true
witness of God's activities as long as the Bible is the true witness of
God's activites. To me that is what you and Paul's position asks one to
accept. And I always want to scream that the Hindu can say that The
Bhagavad-Gita is the true record of God's activities because the
Bhagavad-Gita is the true record of God's acitivities, as well! So we all
stand there saying that our religion is true because our religion is true.
Big deal. Meaningless statement.
glenn
Foundation, Fall and Flood
Adam, Apes and Anthropology
http://www.flash.net/~mortongr/dmd.htm
Lots of information on creation/evolution
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 05 2000 - 19:17:58 EDT