Re: Fossils - correction

From: James Mahaffy (mahaffy@mtcnet.net)
Date: Tue Apr 11 2000 - 07:47:13 EDT

  • Next message: Ted Davis: "A "proper" theology"

    Folks,

    Sorry about that. Even though I spent too much time on the last post I
    didn't proof it quite well enough.

    I did not give you the right url for Art Chadwick piece on the human
    prints. It should be: http://www.grisda.org/reports/or14_33.htm

    I should have said Henry Morris retraction and not recitation (I think
    that must have been a spell checker's error). And in looking again at
    the retraction it is obvious that Henry is leaving the door open to some
    tracks possibly being human even though some he previously thought were
    human, he now thinks are likely dinosaur. I think it still demonstrates
    more of a willingness than we might like to change a position when
    shown that the evidence does not support it.

    On the other hand, I don't see Carl Bough or the person who sometimes
    collects for him, Joe Taylor (Fossil Facts and Fantasies - report on
    Baugh's Brudick print and others), showing the same caution. Both cite
    prints and out of place fossils with little caution (although Joe deals
    superficially with some of Kuban's objections) and I am afraid that both
    do not give the reader the impression that good questions have arisen
    about the authenticity of the fossils they use and it also gives the
    impression that such out of place fossils are quite rare. Carl should at
    least refer to the work that Glen Kuban has done on analyzing his print
    (see url: http://members.aol.com/Paluxy2/wilker5.htm). It is true that
    there is too much caution in reporting anomalies in the standard
    literature (I have seen that more than once), so reporting them is fine
    - but to do so without making any mention of valid doubts about the
    print as Baugh does on his web site is in my mind close to fraudulent.
    It of course, makes it easier for folks (layfolks) who have not dug into
    the literature to cite weak evidence for their position and then sets
    them up to be dismissed as accepting "poor science."

    -- 
    James and Florence Mahaffy    712 722-0381 (Home)
    227 S. Main St.              712 722-6279 (Office)
    Sioux Center, IA 51250
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 11 2000 - 07:46:10 EDT