PERSPECTIVES, March 2000, your article

From: John Burgeson (burgy@compuserve.com)
Date: Tue Apr 04 2000 - 19:23:10 EDT

  • Next message: glenn morton: "Re: Preprogrammed?"

    Peter -- I read your article in the 3/2000 PERSPECTIVES with great
    interest.

    My phusics is now considerably out of date, since I left the field for
    computers
    in 1956 (!), so forgive me if my question is naive.

    Your Figure 3 on page 11 shows the example of twin photons "knowing"
    that "later" they will/will not encounter a polarization filter.

    I do not understand "later." The photon moves at light speed, correct?
    If so, time has no meaning for it -- there is no "later," both filters
    are encountered simultaneously (again, from the photon's viewpoint).

    If so, how can you defend your argument in the text where you
    say (page 11): "How could the two twin photons know that behind the
    semi-transparent mirror (this means later in time) a device is waiting ...
    .?

    Again, forgive me if this question is naive.

    I am posting this email on the ASA LISTSERV also -- perhaps one of
    my friends there can see my difficulty.

    Thanks

    John Burgeson, ASA member



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 04 2000 - 19:24:48 EDT