Re: we have witnessed no new species emerge in the wild? (was Schutzenberger)

From: Huxter4441@aol.com
Date: Wed Dec 06 2000 - 14:34:43 EST

  • Next message: Stephen E. Jones: "Re: Daniel's 70 `weeks' #6 (was How to prove supernaturalism?)"

    In a message dated 12/5/00 11:24:13 AM Eastern Standard Time,
    Susan-Brassfield@ou.edu writes:

    > Susan:
    > evolution is supported by the evidence as well as any other
    > scientific theory and better than some. You keep bringing up out of
    > context quotes and silly stuff like the reptile eggs as your "proof"
    > that evolution isn't true or has "problems" but I think your entire
    > skepticism is based on this false belief: "The necessary starting
    > point of naturalistic evolution is that either there is no God, or
    > if there is, He never intervened in the history of life to do any
    > more creating."
    >
    >

    I would agree with you Susan, but I would simply be accused of trying to make
    the 'layman' look bad and then be assaulted by a slew of half-truths and
    irrelevant quotes...

    Scott



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Dec 06 2000 - 14:35:14 EST