>>Well, I hope I am not that naïve, I'm not really a "true-believer"
>>on this issue, but I do confess to not drinking coffee. Nevertheless, I
>>can "see" a very different future than the ID critic and it doesn't even
>>depend on some sensational ID break-through.
>>
>>It's just in the cards.
>>
>>Shall I explain?
>
>I would be very interested in reading your scenario. I've always enjoyed
>science fiction. ;-)
>
>Richard Wein (Tich)
>
>PS Well done for putting that diaeresis on the word naive. I bet that took
>some work!
nöt ïf hé ùsês ã Mäc :-)
Susan
----------
I am aware that the conclusions arrived at in this work will be denounced
by some as highly irreligious; but he who denounces them is bound to shew
why it is more irreligious to explain the origin of man as a distinct
species by descent from some lower form, through the laws of variation and
natural selection, than to explain the birth of the individual through the
laws of ordinary reproduction.
---Charles Darwin
http://www.telepath.com/susanb/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Oct 06 2000 - 12:57:05 EDT