>FDMAJ: If they have not been done yet, then it is imho quite important that
they are done so that they can support what is now merely assertions. I know
that science can be painful, but in case of a new thesis such as Dembski's it
is quite necessary that such work is done.
DNAunion: Sorry, everyone. I think I did it again. I think I attributed the
above statements to Richard Wein in my original reply to this post. I know I
am coming off as a dufus here, but I really am not familiar with this
e-mail-type "board"
(I could explain further why I keep making mistakes, if anyone cares, but
won't bore everyone unless asked).
Again, sorry for yet another mistake.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 05 2000 - 23:02:29 EDT