Re: ID vs. ?

• Previous message: Richard Wein: "Re: ID vs. ?"
• Maybe in reply to: Bertvan@aol.com: "ID vs. ?"
• Next in thread: FMAJ1019@aol.com: "Re: ID vs. ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

Dear Bertvan

>Bertvan:
>ID is obviously of no value to you. Other scientists are
> finding it a useful concept. Why should you object?

Useful concept to what end? Scientists are mostly - like the rest of us -
interested in funding. Funding by whom? The American Athiest Assoc?<G>

Scientists are interested in ID but not in the designer? Boggles my mind.
I can't think of a parallel situation. Police investigating the mechanics
of a murder with no interest in finding the murderer?

billwald@juno.com

________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.

• Next message: Bertvan@aol.com: "ID vs.?"
• Previous message: Richard Wein: "Re: ID vs. ?"
• Maybe in reply to: Bertvan@aol.com: "ID vs. ?"
• Next in thread: FMAJ1019@aol.com: "Re: ID vs. ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 02 2000 - 11:45:16 EDT