--part1_0.1b4831d3.2571e87d_boundary
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Return-path: Huxter4441@aol.com
From: Huxter4441@aol.com
Full-name: Huxter4441
Message-ID: <0.b328c4fb.2571e858@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 1999 21:07:20 EST
Subject: Re: Why assume a lie?
To: Bertvan@aol.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 38
In a message dated 11/28/99 12:56:47 AM !!!First Boot!!!, Bertvan@aol.com
writes:
<< Huxter wrote:
>**** Well, maybe if Berthajane would address the issues once in awhile
>istead of hiding behind what she considers ad homs or philosophy, we
>wouldn't be so disgusted with her....
>Many moons ago, Bertvan posted frequently to the Internet Infidels
evolution
>board. She was quite certain evolution did not happen. In fact, she
claimed
>to have 'proof' on a web page she operated. Upon visiting the page,
>however,. all one saw was an essay on mental illlness. That disgusts
me...Huxter
Hi Huxter,
It isn't an essay, Huxter. It's an entertaining true account of my
psychoanalysis. It's also an argument against materialism.
Bertvan
Http://members.aol.com/bertv >>
HUXTER:
And yet it is totally irrlevent to evolution. You may dislike the
materialist philosophy. So what. Your (and Johnson's, etc.) does not make
it non-viable. Nor does it have any bearing on whether or not evolution is
true. I fin that when one tries to turn this into a philosophical debate, it
is because they have no evidence on their side. Your refusal to address the
points of my previous post, and instead your focusing on the 'philosophical'
point bears witness to that.
--part1_0.1b4831d3.2571e87d_boundary--