RE: abiogenesis was a mystery. Now it's not such a big mystery
Susan B (susan-brassfield@ou.edu)
Sun, 12 Sep 1999 17:19:35 -0500 (CDT)>>SJ: It highlights Phil Johnson's observation that for Darwinists "evidence
>is not
>>really necessary". The problem is already solved in the definitions:
>
>Pim:
>>Well, dear Phil hardly should be taken to seriously.
>>So Stephen, why are you ignoring the reality that science has learned lots
>about abiogenesis?
>
>Susan: for the same reason that Phillip Johnson ignores it: because it
serves the
>purpose.
>
Pim:
>But that destroys any opportunity for a scientific discussion then?
well, duh! of course. Neither Stephen nor Johnson are the slightest bit
interested in discussing science and the evidence for evolution. They are
propagandists. They are hoping they can make evolution go away by using
rhetoric.
Susan
--------
Peace is not the absence of conflict--it is the presence of justice.
--Martin Luther King, Jr.
Please visit my website:
http://www.telepath.com/susanb