> DT: In this area, it is Darwinists
> who are muddying the waters! My agument here is for consistency.
>
> Pim: I agree. But they are only human.
Interesting! I hope we are not seeing a hint of double standards
here.
> DT: In a way, I agree with the Darwinian authors of the letter to Nature.
> Where I disagree with them is that this Darwinian position is the
> only one that is acceptable in the academic community.
>
> Any scientific explanation which does a better job at explaining the observations of evolutions would be acceptable.
But if intelligent causation is part of the explanation, some will
rule this as unacceptable. This brings us full circle in the
argument.
Best regards,
David J. Tyler.