RE: Darwinists contradictions re new genetic information

Pim van Meurs (entheta@eskimo.com)
Wed, 23 Jun 1999 23:16:15 -0700

SJ: What's deep committment got to do with it? Obviously there has been an
information increase from bacteria to bacteriologists. The question is
what (or who) was responsible for this massive information build up?

No evidence of a who. So why invoke it when natural mechanism can explain it.

SJ: And of course the information increase is *stored* in "the genome". The
questions are: 1) what is its *source*? and 2) how did it get there?

Simple gene duplications, mutations, selection.

SB>Unless, of course - for anything goes in such
>addle-brained theorising - God works his evolutionary miracles by
>nongenetic means. "

SJ: If God "worked miracles" such as supernaturally increasing the information
content of genomes, then it wouldn't be "evolutionary". It would be
*creationary*.

And such a hypothesis is non-scientific as well.