RE: Two Complementary faces of establishment science

Pim van Meurs (entheta@eskimo.com)
Wed, 23 Jun 1999 09:06:14 -0700

Pim: "Furthermore without an understanding of how these terms were
used, it is too easy to confuse them with ID. Perhaps it is the hopes
of design proponents which make them inte> "

DT: Perhaps you would like to suggest reasons why Darwinists, who hold so strongly to the stochastic character of mutations and of environmental pressures, find it so easy to drop into terminology that is better suited to an intelligently engineered world.

They are terms which have a loaded meaning, perhaps they should be avoided but when properly understood how they are used in the various circumstances, one can still understand the meaning.
It's a confusion which arises when common vocabulary is used to discuss issues.