lots of reasonable comments by open minded people today. I'm especially
grateful for the web site. I''d be interested in hearing comments about the
following web site:
http://www.scientificamerican.com/0997issue/0997infocus.html
It seems to me somewhere in this research lies an area of compromise.
Creationists could find room for claiming it was part of of God's design.
Agnostics could settle for Nature's design. The Darwinists are already
claiming "evolvability" is a trait which itself evolved--by random mutation
and natural selection, I suppose. (Old ideas don't just fade away; their
supporters die off.)
Bertvan