Science does not say that the actual events are replicable but that the observations are replicable.
Don't get me wrong, I am not against examining the evidence we have now, but
I sometimes wonder 'just how much can we actually establish?' I hear people
assume evolution has been proven, and others saying it's been disproven: is
either statement valid? CAN either be?
Science does not deal in absolute proof. But I would be interested in the evidence that disproved evolution.