RE: Cambridge Publishes Neo-Creationism

Pim van Meurs (entheta@eskimo.com)
Wed, 11 Nov 1998 21:00:53 -0800

"Well, the ID proponents certainly hope to show that this theory IS testable
scientifically, don't they? Isn't that what Dembski's argument is trying to
accomplish (even if you think he fails to do so)?"

Dembski's error is in the specification of his "filter" as well as in the idea that there basically is only a choice between evolution or design. That he uses Behe's argument about IC, an argument which has been shown to be erroneous, only further undermines his position.

I'd love to hear more from people about Dembski's 'filter' and his arguments.