Re: The Evolutionist: Liar, Believer In Miracles, King of Criminals.

Joseph Mastropaolo (mastropaolo@net999.com)
Thu, 29 Oct 1998 11:55:32 -0700

> It does appear that Haeckel was convicted by a University Court of
>fraud.
That was from Pim van Meurs. Don't you believe Pim?

I insist that the money be put in escrow with instructions. I
incorporated your claim, not mine, that Haeckle was tried in court. I
also equally provided for settlement if you can't provide what you claim
and if I can't provide what I claim. As given, it will be settled.
Neither you nor I will be able to escape the consequences of this
showdown. Attend to the challenge:

> (1) You give the evidence that Haeckel was tried in municipal, state,
> state superior, state appellate, state supreme, federal, federal
> appellate or federal supreme court for his fraudulent embryo drawings,
> then I'll give evidence that he was convicted.
> (2) If you can't give the evidence that Haeckel was tried in court for
> his fraudulent embryo drawings, then I shall give evidence from a
> peer-reviewed science publication that he falsified the drawings.
> (3) We both deposit $100,000 in escrow by 15 November 1998 with the
> following instructions:
> (a) If you give the evidence in (1) and I do not, then you collect the
> $200,000.
> (b) If we both execute (1), then I collect the $200,000.
> (c) If you cannot give the evidence in (1), and I cannot give the
> evidence in (2), then you collect the $200,000.
> (d) If you cannot give the evidence in (1), and I do give the evidence
> in (2), then I collect the $200,000.
> Agreed?
> Joseph Mastropaolo