Re: Dawkins and increase in information
Arthur V. Chadwick (chadwicka@swau.edu)
Tue, 29 Sep 1998 08:56:17 -0700What genuinely puzzles me is that we were so quick to condemn the
interviewere who produced the tape, but we have no condemnation for Dawkins
who obviously has lied and fabricated a backpeddling of enormous
proportions to cover himself. Sounds like a certain president I know of.
But the question is why? Why do we not give our brothers the benefit of
the doubt, but we accord Dawkins complete innocence. Even Glenn in his
explanation offered no suggestion that Dawkins was anything but innocent.
What gives here? And, what about his silence on that question, which after
all seems to be the question of the hour here?
Art
http://biology.swau.edu