RE: Petersen's Book

Janet Miller (janetmiller@my-dejanews.com)
Thu, 10 Sep 1998 08:51:39 -0700


--

On Thu, 10 Sep 1998 06:27:24 Glenn R. Morton wrote:>At 10:39 PM 9/9/98 -0700, Janet Miller wrote:

>>> But Petersen's findings suggest an alternative >>interpretation which, frankly, I prefer. Namely, as >>the readers of this LIST now understand, he shows from >>the loessian nodules that, under extraordinary >>conditions, ponderable matter can enter our "plane" of >>existence, effectively from out of nowhere, along a >>fourth dimension of space. This opens the possibility >>that, upon an occasion, a fine dust containing polonium >>(among other things perhaps) materialized within the >>granite, which on decaying gave rise to the haloes. It >>is interesting to note that one must conclude that any >>such polonium was in effect created by that unusual >>event. If it had previously existed somewhere then >>presumably it would have already decayed--even as all >>the rest of primordial polonium has long since decayed.>> I anticipate that you will scoff at this suggestion, but may I ask>how you account for the polonium haloes in granitic mica?>>Scoff? No. Let me provide evidence against that idea. Why is loess>primarily in the northern Hemisphere above 30 degrees? If loess is from>the 4th dimension, why does the 4th dimension work so poorly at the equator>where there is no loess and only a little loess exists in the southern>hemisphere. What is it about the southern hemisphere that impedes the>operation of the 4th dimension?>

Glenn;

Why in the world would you ask me these questions?We are considering here a bizarre phenomenon, the cause of which is obscure, and one which does not conform to reason or abide by the normal laws of physics. Therefore, I will not accept the burden of explaining any of these things.

Janet

-----== Sent via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==-----http://www.dejanews.com/ Easy access to 50,000+ discussion forums