It has been asserted that Mr. Petersen's photographs didn't show much
and in fact were mislabeled in some cases. It has been shown that he
ignored some of the evidence presented in his own reference material.
It has been pointed out that Mr. Petersen has made no predections that
can be followed up on, or conducted any experiements that can be
repeated.
If he presents evidence it *will* be examined in detail and has
obviously been by some of the people on this list. It was found to be
lacking. Maybe he needs to answer some of their objections. Any
scientist presenting any scientific theory has to defend his evidence
and answer his critics. That's the way it works. Darwin had to do it.
Petersen has to do it.
You sound like you are miffed that people didn't fall down at his
feet. It ain't gonna happen. And it sounds like his ideas are *highly*
assailable.
Susan
==
---http://www.telepath.com/susanb_________________________________________________________DO YOU YAHOO!?Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com