Re: An Evil Fruit

Vernon Jenkins (vernon.jenkins@virgin.net)
Thu, 30 Jul 1998 00:11:59 +0100

Pim van Meurs wrote:

> You are confused about evolution. Evolution does not challenge the >'literal truth' of the early chapters of Genesis. Nor do we now if >Genesis is the 'literal truth'. Furthermore man is indeed of 'animal >status' and so what ?

Pim,

I think you'll find the general view to be that a literal interpretation
of the Creation Narrative given in Gen.1 is challenged by the Theory of
Evolution.

>And religion has lead to persecutions, murder, genocide. So what ? You >should not blame evolution for the deeds of man.

On this point, please see my reply to Glenn Morton.

> How so ?

A doctrine which undermines clear biblical teaching encourages
experimentation with other belief systems. There are many examples of
'wishful thinking' religions extant which offer a 'second chance' (and
more) at getting things right in this life. I'm sure you're well
acquainted with this fact.

> How so ? What ideas are you refering to ?

An atheistic evolutionist believes that life arose spontaneously
billions of years ago as a result of complex chemical reactions that
took place in a 'primeval soup'. He then argues that, if here, why not
there? - on some planet where conditions are equally favorable.

The SETI project reveals that many believe there to be life forms 'out
there' superior to our own.

It is to these ideas that I refer.

>Is it ? Your accusations appear to be hollow and more indicative of >problems with your personal faith. And yet you claim to know the Truth

Are you not aware of the resistance to the presentation of creationist
arguments in our schools and colleges, in the media, and elsewhere? It
is a very real phenomenon, I can assure you.

I have no problem with my own faith, and believe I know the Truth - at
least, inasfar as the Lord has revealed it to me.

Vernon