Re: Evolution!!

john queen ii (john.queen.ii@mail.utexas.edu)
Tue, 14 Jul 1998 08:58:12 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Hofmann, Jim: "Evolution!"
Previous message: Glenn R. Morton: "Re: Evolution!!"
Maybe in reply to: hala ghazal: "Evolution!!"
Next in thread: Bill Payne: "Re: Evolution!!"

> And if an experiment has not been
>consistently carried out for the past 10,000 years or more, then you can't
>say that experiments have indicated anything!

----EXACTLY!
----NOR CAN YOU SAY ANYTHING UNDER YOUR REQUIRMENTS!
----OR ANYONE ELSE FOR THAT 'REASON'
----OR DOES PROOF FOR EVOLUTION TAKE LESS TESTING?
----I THINK THERE'S A REASONING PROBLEM HERE

john w queen ii
dept of chemistry
univ of texas at austin
john.queen.ii@mail.utexas.edu

Next message: Hofmann, Jim: "Evolution!"
Previous message: Glenn R. Morton: "Re: Evolution!!"
Maybe in reply to: hala ghazal: "Evolution!!"
Next in thread: Bill Payne: "Re: Evolution!!"