I am not sure that I agree with your views but I am impressed with
the way
they are thought out. The logic seems mostly solid. I am curious
to
know: how sure is science about the pseudogene not having a
purpose? It seems like things in the past which have no purpose
have been
found to have a use afterall.
one more question about your logic from a webpage of yours:
" If you remember the
verse Genesis 3:19 God said, "for dust you are and to dust you shall
return." A dead body is "dust." Adam came from dust and to dust he now
will return.~
Those who will object that a dead body is not "dust" should consider this.
If you say that 'dust" must be DUST, then why does God call the
living Adam 'dust'? Genesis 3:19 states, "...for dust you are and to dust
you will return." (NIV) When that was spoken Adam was a living being
and so the dust does not mean dirt! And one can not ignore the fact that
when Adam died he would become a corpse(i.e. a return to dust). "
You say that a dead body is dust. "Then why does God call the living Adam
'dust'?" By your own logic this cannot mean that a dust is a dead body.